2024-ballot-proposals
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2024-ballot-proposals [2024/07/09 02:43] – sweda | 2024-ballot-proposals [2024/08/22 02:48] (current) – rpeltz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
< | < | ||
- | 2024-XX) | + | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
- | Change | + | |
- | (Extra Starts) | + | 2024-01) |
+ | [effective immediately] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Modify section 4.3 (Free Agent Signings) to allow teams to request a | ||
+ | special exemption that will preserve their free agent priority. | ||
+ | |||
+ | from: | ||
+ | In the case of a conflict between teams attempting to sign the same free | ||
+ | agent, the player will be assigned to teams by the following priority: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1) Teams not on probation who have reported their home results from | ||
+ | the most recent week of play and have no other outstanding results or box | ||
+ | scores, in reverse order of winning percentage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2) Teams not on probation but with outstanding results or boxscores | ||
+ | (even if an extension has been granted), in reverse order of winning | ||
+ | percentage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3) Teams on probation, in reverse order of winning percentage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | to: | ||
+ | In the case of a conflict between teams attempting to sign the same free | ||
+ | agent, the player will be assigned to teams by the following priority: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1) Teams not on probation who have reported their home results from | ||
+ | the most recent week of play (or have been approved for a special exemption) | ||
+ | and have no other outstanding results or box scores, in reverse order of | ||
+ | winning percentage. | ||
+ | before the Monday results deadline, and can only be requested if extraordinary | ||
+ | factors prevent the games from being played on time. Approval is at the | ||
+ | Commissioner' | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2) Teams not on probation but with outstanding results or boxscores | ||
+ | (even if an extension has been granted), in reverse order of winning | ||
+ | percentage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3) Teams on probation, in reverse order of winning percentage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2024-02) | ||
+ | [effective for 2025 season] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add a new paragraph/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | During the regular season, when rolling a player injury, if a player' | ||
+ | card has DL days above 0 and he has already served as many or more than | ||
+ | his DL days, modify his durability rating by adding 4, with a maximum | ||
+ | adjusted value of 7. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [rationale] | ||
+ | Many owners have expressed frustration at injury prone players having to | ||
+ | serve multiple long injuries, missing far more days than they did in MLB. | ||
+ | This change will still allow the possibility of additional injuries, even | ||
+ | another long injury, but make them less likely and usually less severe. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2024-03) | ||
+ | [effective for 2025 season] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add a new section (3.7 is Pitcher Fatigue and Rest): | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3.7.XX Fatigue Limit | ||
+ | |||
+ | A pitcher may face a maximum of 9 batters while fatigued and then must | ||
+ | be removed, unless no other pitchers are available. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [reasoning] | ||
+ | This will still allow owners the flexibility to get a pitcher extra usage, | ||
+ | or eat a couple innings to save the bullpen, but prevent some of the more | ||
+ | ridiculous situations like a bad pitcher being left in to get destroyed | ||
+ | for the whole game. This would never be allowed to occur in a real game, | ||
+ | it is an exploit of our usage requirements, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2024-04) | ||
+ | [effective for 2025 season] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change | ||
+ | |||
+ | Changes 4.4 (Player Releases) | ||
+ | |||
+ | from: | ||
+ | Owners may release from their roster any player who has not exceeded his | ||
+ | 133% usage from opening day until the Newsletter following the trade deadline. | ||
+ | |||
+ | to: | ||
+ | Owners may release from their roster any player who has not exceeded his | ||
+ | 125% usage from opening day until the Newsletter following the trade deadline. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Changes 4.5.2 (Usage Requirements) | ||
+ | |||
+ | from: | ||
+ | Every player must accrue IBL usage of at least 75% (3/4) but no more | ||
+ | than 133% (4/3) of their usage in the previous MLB season. | ||
+ | |||
+ | to: | ||
+ | Every player must accrue IBL usage of at least 75% (3/4) but no more | ||
+ | than 125% (5/4) of their usage in the previous MLB season. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Changes 4.5.4 (Usage Caps) | ||
+ | |||
+ | from: | ||
+ | Players may continue to participate during the regular season despite | ||
+ | exceeding their 133% usage limitation, but a player may not exceed 150%. | ||
+ | Failure to comply with this rule shall result in forfeiture of any games | ||
+ | in which a player participated while exceeding 150% usage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | to: | ||
+ | Players may continue to participate during the regular season despite | ||
+ | exceeding their 125% usage limitation, but a player may not exceed 150%. | ||
+ | Failure to comply with this rule shall result in forfeiture of any games | ||
+ | in which a player participated while exceeding 150% usage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [rationale] | ||
+ | It makes more sense for the required usage range to be plus or minus 25% | ||
+ | rather than having different limits above and below. | ||
+ | starting pitchers, allowing them to go 33% above MLB usage is excessive, as | ||
+ | a pitcher who went 210 innings in real life can now go 280 innnings in the | ||
+ | IBL, which is an enormous and unrealistic workload which is much different | ||
+ | than 210 innings. | ||
+ | of other good pitcher cards as well, possibly helping offense a little in | ||
+ | our current historically low offense environment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2024-05) | ||
+ | [effective for 2025 season] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change Rule 3.5 (Extra Starts) | ||
from: | from: | ||
Line 25: | Line 161: | ||
considered as using one of the pitcher' | considered as using one of the pitcher' | ||
exceptions: | exceptions: | ||
- | * | + | * |
+ | * | ||
* | * | ||
removed due to injury or ejection | removed due to injury or ejection | ||
Line 44: | Line 181: | ||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2024-06) | ||
+ | [effective for 2025 season] | ||
- | 2024-XX) | ||
Change wording in Rule 3.2.3 | Change wording in Rule 3.2.3 | ||
(Game Appearance and Starting Position Limitations) | (Game Appearance and Starting Position Limitations) | ||
Line 61: | Line 201: | ||
- | Change wording in Rule 3.7.1 | + | Change wording in Rule 3.7.1 (Starting Pitchers) |
- | (Starting Pitchers) | + | |
from: | from: | ||
Line 92: | Line 231: | ||
- | 2024-XX) | + | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+ | |||
+ | 2024-07) | ||
+ | [effective for 2025 season] | ||
Change wording in Rule 3.2.3 | Change wording in Rule 3.2.3 | ||
(Game Appearance and Starting Position Limitations) | (Game Appearance and Starting Position Limitations) | ||
Line 134: | Line 277: | ||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2024-08) | ||
+ | [effective for 2025 season] | ||
- | 2024-XX) | ||
Add new Rule: | Add new Rule: | ||
Line 153: | Line 299: | ||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
- | 2024-XX) | + | 2024-09) |
- | Change wording in Rule 4.6.1 | + | |
- | (Draft Order) | + | |
[effective for 2025 season] | [effective for 2025 season] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change wording in Rule 4.6.1 (Draft Order) | ||
from: | from: | ||
Line 190: | Line 336: | ||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
- | 2024-XX) | + | 2024-10) |
- | Change wording in Rule 3.2.2 | + | [effective for 2025 season] |
- | (Inactive Roster) | + | |
+ | Change wording in Rule 3.2.2 (Inactive Roster) | ||
from: | from: | ||
Line 211: | Line 359: | ||
* they had at least 150 MLB plate appearances (PA) as a batter OR | * they had at least 150 MLB plate appearances (PA) as a batter OR | ||
at least 150 MLB batters faced (BF) as a pitcher | at least 150 MLB batters faced (BF) as a pitcher | ||
- | * the length of their injury | + | * the length of their injury |
five IBL weeks subsequent to placement on IR | five IBL weeks subsequent to placement on IR | ||
- | Players on Injured Reserve (IR) are subject to the following restrictions: | + | Players on Injured Reserve (IR) are ineligible to be placed on the active |
- | * | + | or post-season roster, and are subject to the following restrictions: |
+ | * | ||
* they may not be traded until the subsequent off-season | * they may not be traded until the subsequent off-season | ||
- | * they may not be released until week 8 of the following season | + | * they may not be released until week 8 of the following |
* | * | ||
rules as players who were uncarded the previous season (see 3.1.2) | rules as players who were uncarded the previous season (see 3.1.2) | ||
Line 229: | Line 378: | ||
trade-offs for gaining the benefit of an additional roster spot, so that IR | trade-offs for gaining the benefit of an additional roster spot, so that IR | ||
isn't reflexively used to speculatively stash free agents. | isn't reflexively used to speculatively stash free agents. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
+ | |||
</ | </ |
2024-ballot-proposals.1720507385.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/07/09 02:43 by sweda