2006_post-seaosn_ballot
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
2006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/11/28 05:05] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.1 | 2006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/12/21 06:59] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 199: | Line 199: | ||
== proposal 7.0, regular season schedule 2.1.1 == | == proposal 7.0, regular season schedule 2.1.1 == | ||
proposed by Mike Monostra | proposed by Mike Monostra | ||
- | odd numbered years example | + | |
+ | odd numbered years transcribed by Gerard because he was too lazy to do both examples. | ||
A few guys have talked about wanting to add more interleague games to the schedule. I came up with a new schedule to satisfy that need. However, while adding interleague games conference games were subtracted. Here is the formula: | A few guys have talked about wanting to add more interleague games to the schedule. I came up with a new schedule to satisfy that need. However, while adding interleague games conference games were subtracted. Here is the formula: | ||
Line 212: | Line 213: | ||
Let me know on your thoughts. | Let me know on your thoughts. | ||
- | ^ Week ^ 1 ^ 2 ^ 3 ^ 4 ^ 5 ^ 6 ^ 7 ^ 8 ^ 9 ^ 10 ^ 11 ^ 12 ^ AC Interleague Home Games | + | |
+ | ^ Season schedule, same format as currently used. ^ ^ AC then NC Home series for interleague play. ^ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Week ^ 1 ^ 2 ^ 3 ^ 4 ^ 5 ^ 6 ^ 7 ^ 8 ^ 9 ^ 10 ^ 11 ^ 12 ^ | ||
^ 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 10 | ^ Week ^ BUF ^ CAP ^ COU ^ TRI ^ BOW ^ MCM ^ PHI ^ WMS ^ LAW ^ PAD ^ POR ^ STL ^ | ^ 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 10 | ^ Week ^ BUF ^ CAP ^ COU ^ TRI ^ BOW ^ MCM ^ PHI ^ WMS ^ LAW ^ PAD ^ POR ^ STL ^ | ||
^ 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 12 | 11 | ^ 8 | MIL | SDQ | CAJ | CSP | DTR | HAG | BUZ | COL | SEA | SPO | CRE | MAD | | ^ 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 12 | 11 | ^ 8 | MIL | SDQ | CAJ | CSP | DTR | HAG | BUZ | COL | SEA | SPO | CRE | MAD | | ||
Line 239: | Line 243: | ||
^ 25 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 10 | | ^ 25 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 10 | | ||
^ 26 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | | ^ 26 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | | ||
+ | == proposal 7.1, regular season schedule 2.1.1 == | ||
+ | for those who prefer to not play interconference games | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each team will play each other team in their division for 30 games. | ||
+ | Each team will play the other teams from their conference 9 games, with extra home series traded from year to year to even the disadvantage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == proposal 8.0; Revise Playoff Structure to Traditional Methods == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Proposed by Jed Rosenthal (TRI) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Revise playoff structure to traditional method instead of " | ||
+ | |||
+ | The playoff structure will be as follows: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Five teams from each conference will continue to make the playoffs - 3 division winners and 2 wild card teams from each conference. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == proposal 9; All-Star Game winner gets home field in IBL CS == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Proposed by George Blas | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the spirit of Gerard' | ||
+ | The winning conference of the All-Star Game will gain home field advantage in the IBL Championship Series. Games one, two, six and seven will be played at the site of the conference that won the All-Star Game, with the losing conference hosting games three, four and five. |
2006_post-seaosn_ballot.txt · Last modified: 2006/12/23 10:08 by 127.0.0.1