User Tools

Site Tools


2006_post-seaosn_ballot

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
2006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/11/28 04:58] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.12006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/12/10 19:52] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.1
Line 199: Line 199:
 == proposal 7.0, regular season schedule 2.1.1 == == proposal 7.0, regular season schedule 2.1.1 ==
 proposed by Mike Monostra proposed by Mike Monostra
-^ Week ^ 1 ^ 2 ^ 3 ^ 4 ^ 5 ^ 6 ^ 7 ^ 8 ^ 9 ^ 10 ^ 11 ^ 12 ^ + 
 +odd numbered years transcribed by Gerard because he was too lazy to do both examples. 
 + 
 +A few guys have talked about wanting to add more interleague games to the schedule. I came up with a new schedule to satisfy that need. However, while adding interleague games conference games were subtracted. Here is the formula: 
 + 
 +18 games, 9 home, 9 away against divisional opponents, same as current format. 
 + 
 +9 games against non divisional conference opponents. I set up a rotation where teams will play four conference opponents twice at home, once away and the other four twice away and once at home. The schedule would flip flop every other year so teams that played an opponent once at home the previous season would play them twice the next season and vice versa. 
 + 
 +3 games against each opponent in the opposing conference. Each team would play six opponents at home and six away. The schedule would flip flop the next season so that everyone will get to play each interleague opponent every other year. 
 + 
 +I've created two schedules, one used in odd years and the other in even years to reflect the flip-flop of the schedule. It may seem confusing, but I feel as though people who want more interleague play will like this. I personally, believe the current schedule and the one I created both work. It is up to the rest of you. 
 + 
 +Let me know on your thoughts.  
 + 
 +^ Season schedule, same format as currently used.   ^ ^ AC then NC Home series for interleague play. ^ 
 +  
 +^ Week ^ 1 ^ 2 ^ 3 ^ 4 ^ 5 ^ 6 ^ 7 ^ 8 ^ 9 ^ 10 ^ 11 ^ 12 ^
 ^ 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 10 | ^ Week ^ BUF ^ CAP ^ COU ^ TRI ^ BOW ^ MCM ^ PHI ^ WMS ^ LAW ^ PAD ^ POR ^ STL ^ ^ 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 10 | ^ Week ^ BUF ^ CAP ^ COU ^ TRI ^ BOW ^ MCM ^ PHI ^ WMS ^ LAW ^ PAD ^ POR ^ STL ^
 ^ 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 12 | 11 | ^ 8 | MIL | SDQ | CAJ | CSP | DTR | HAG | BUZ | COL | SEA | SPO | CRE | MAD | ^ 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 12 | 11 | ^ 8 | MIL | SDQ | CAJ | CSP | DTR | HAG | BUZ | COL | SEA | SPO | CRE | MAD |
Line 207: Line 224:
 ^ 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | ^ 19 | SEA | SPO | CRE | MAD | MIL | SDQ | CAJ | CSP | DTR | HAG | BUZ | COL | ^ 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | ^ 19 | SEA | SPO | CRE | MAD | MIL | SDQ | CAJ | CSP | DTR | HAG | BUZ | COL |
 ^ 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ^ 20 | SPO | SEA | MAD | CRE | SDQ | MIL | CSP | CAJ | HAG | DTR | COL | BUZ | ^ 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ^ 20 | SPO | SEA | MAD | CRE | SDQ | MIL | CSP | CAJ | HAG | DTR | COL | BUZ |
-^ 8 ^ I ^ N ^ T ^ E ^ R ^ L ^ E ^ A ^ G ^ U ^ E ^ ! ^ +^ 8 ^ I ^ N ^ T ^ E ^ R ^ L ^ E ^ A ^ G ^ U ^ E ^ ! ^
 ^ 9 ^ I ^ N ^ T ^ E ^ R ^ L ^ E ^ A ^ G ^ U ^ E ^ ! ^  ^ 9 ^ I ^ N ^ T ^ E ^ R ^ L ^ E ^ A ^ G ^ U ^ E ^ ! ^
 ^ 10 ^ I ^ N ^ T ^ E ^ R ^ L ^ E ^ A ^ G ^ U ^ E ^ ! ^  ^ 10 ^ I ^ N ^ T ^ E ^ R ^ L ^ E ^ A ^ G ^ U ^ E ^ ! ^
Line 226: Line 243:
 ^ 25 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 10 |  ^ 25 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 10 |
 ^ 26 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 |  ^ 26 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 |
 +== proposal 7.1, regular season schedule 2.1.1 ==
 +for those who prefer to not play interconference games
 +
 +Each team will play each other team in their division for 30 games.
 +Each team will play the other teams from their conference 9 games, with extra home series traded from year to year to even the disadvantage.
 +
 +
 +== proposal 8.0; Revise Playoff Structure to Traditional Methods ==
 +
 +Revise playoff structure to traditional method instead of "choosing your opponent".
 +
 +The playoff structure will be as follows:
  
 +Five teams from each conference will continue to make the playoffs - 3 division winners and 2 wild card teams from each conference.  Each of the 2 wildcard teams will play each other in a best of 5 game series.  The wild card winner will then play the team with the best record in his respective conference in a best of 7 series with the "best record" team having home field advantage.  The other 2 division winners will play each other in a best of 7 series and the team with the better regular season record will have home field advantage.  In the case each team has the same record, head-to-head play will be used as a tiebreaker.  The winners of each series will then square off in the conference championship in a best of 7 series - again home field advantage is determined by better regular season record and tiebreakers are determined by head-to-head records. The championship winners will meet in the IBL World Series in a best of 7 series.  The team with the better regular season record will have home field advantage (although if preferred it can be alternated between AC/NC each year).
2006_post-seaosn_ballot.txt · Last modified: 2006/12/23 10:08 by 127.0.0.1