2006_post-seaosn_ballot
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/11/28 05:11] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.1 | 2006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/12/23 10:08] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
Let me know on your thoughts. | Let me know on your thoughts. | ||
- | Season schedule, same format as currently used. | + | ^ Season schedule, same format as currently used. ^ ^ AC then NC Home series for interleague play. ^ |
^ Week ^ 1 ^ 2 ^ 3 ^ 4 ^ 5 ^ 6 ^ 7 ^ 8 ^ 9 ^ 10 ^ 11 ^ 12 ^ | ^ Week ^ 1 ^ 2 ^ 3 ^ 4 ^ 5 ^ 6 ^ 7 ^ 8 ^ 9 ^ 10 ^ 11 ^ 12 ^ | ||
Line 243: | Line 243: | ||
^ 25 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 10 | | ^ 25 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 10 | | ||
^ 26 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | | ^ 26 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | | ||
+ | == proposal 7.1, regular season schedule 2.1.1 == | ||
+ | for those who prefer to not play interconference games | ||
+ | Each team will play each other team in their division for 30 games. | ||
+ | Each team will play the other teams from their conference 9 games, with extra home series traded from year to year to even the disadvantage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == proposal 8.0; Revise Playoff Structure to Traditional Methods == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Proposed by Jed Rosenthal (TRI) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Revise playoff structure to traditional method instead of " | ||
+ | |||
+ | The playoff structure will be as follows: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Five teams from each conference will continue to make the playoffs - 3 division winners and 2 wild card teams from each conference. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == proposal 9.0; All-Star Game winner gets home field in IBL CS == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Proposed by George Blas, POR | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the spirit of Gerard' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The winning conference of the All-Star Game will gain home field advantage in the IBL Championship Series. Games one, two, six and seven will be played at the site of the conference that won the All-Star Game, with the losing conference hosting games three, four and five. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == proposal 10.0; Require home manager to send GRS to the manager hosting the visiting team for next week == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Proposed by George Blas, POR | ||
+ | |||
+ | Along the same lines of current rules, where home manager sends GRS to next week's visiting manager. Update section 6.2 to say: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Each member is required to send via E-mail, FAX, US Mail or phone a game report for their home series to the Commissioner, | ||
+ | |||
+ | e.g. In week 19, schedule has TRI@PHI. Week 20 has BUF@PHI and TRI@WMS. So PHI would be required to send Wk 19 TRI@PHI GRS to WMS in addition to TRI and BUF. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == proposal 11.0; Yet another pitcher-batting rule == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Proposed by Christian Beliveau, SPO | ||
+ | |||
+ | Manager declare at the beginning of the year if their park will be DH only or open to pitcher batting. Their decision will be available on the web site and could not be change for the year. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Visiting manager decide if the game will be play with DH rule or pitcher batting when there is an opening for it and send his MIS accordingly to his choice. | ||
+ | |||
+ | PA accumulate by pitchers can be redistributed to any batting player to a maximum of: | ||
+ | |||
+ | option A: 1 PA per game that player play in the IBL | ||
+ | |||
+ | option B: 2 PA per game that player play in the IBL |
2006_post-seaosn_ballot.1164708662.txt.gz · Last modified: 2006/11/28 05:12 (external edit)