Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/11/28 05:04] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.1
+++ 2006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/12/23 10:08] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 199: / Line 199: @@
 == proposal 7.0, regular season schedule 2.1.1 ==
 proposed by Mike Monostra
-odd numbered years example transcribed by Gerard because he was too lazy to do both.
+odd numbered years transcribed by Gerard because he was too lazy to do both examples.
 A few guys have talked about wanting to add more interleague games to the schedule. I came up with a new schedule to satisfy that need. However, while adding interleague games conference games were subtracted. Here is the formula:
@@ Line 212: / Line 213: @@
 Let me know on your thoughts.
-^	Week	^	1	^	2	^	3	^	4	^	5	^	6	^	7	^	8	^	9	^	10	^	11	^	12	^		AC Interleague Home Games
+^ Season schedule, same format as currently used.   ^ ^ AC then NC Home series for interleague play. ^
+^	Week	^	1	^	2	^	3	^	4	^	5	^	6	^	7	^	8	^	9	^	10	^	11	^	12	^
 ^	1	|	4	|	3	|	1	|	2	|	8	|	7	|	5	|	6	|	12	|	11	|	9	|	10	|		^	Week	^	BUF	^	CAP	^	COU	^	TRI	^	BOW	^	MCM	^	PHI	^	WMS	^	LAW	^	PAD	^	POR	^	STL	^
 ^	2	|	2	|	1	|	4	|	3	|	6	|	5	|	8	|	7	|	10	|	9	|	12	|	11	|		^	8	|	MIL	|	SDQ	|	CAJ	|	CSP	|	DTR	|	HAG	|	BUZ	|	COL	|	SEA	|	SPO	|	CRE	|	MAD	|
@@ Line 220: / Line 224: @@
 ^	6	|	5	|	8	|	7	|	6	|	9	|	12	|	11	|	10	|	1	|	4	|	3	|	2	|		^	19	|	SEA	|	SPO	|	CRE	|	MAD	|	MIL	|	SDQ	|	CAJ	|	CSP	|	DTR	|	HAG	|	BUZ	|	COL	|
 ^	7	|	8	|	7	|	6	|	5	|	12	|	11	|	10	|	9	|	4	|	3	|	2	|	1	|		^	20	|	SPO	|	SEA	|	MAD	|	CRE	|	SDQ	|	MIL	|	CSP	|	CAJ	|	HAG	|	DTR	|	COL	|	BUZ	|
-^	8	^	I	^	N	^	T	^	E	^	R	^	L	^	E	^	A	^	G	^	U	^	E	^	!	^	   NC Interleague Home Series
+^	8	^	I	^	N	^	T	^	E	^	R	^	L	^	E	^	A	^	G	^	U	^	E	^	!	^
 ^	9	^	I	^	N	^	T	^	E	^	R	^	L	^	E	^	A	^	G	^	U	^	E	^	!	^
 ^	10	^	I	^	N	^	T	^	E	^	R	^	L	^	E	^	A	^	G	^	U	^	E	^	!	^
@@ Line 239: / Line 243: @@
 ^	25	|	3	|	1	|	4	|	2	|	7	|	5	|	8	|	6	|	11	|	9	|	12	|	10	|
 ^	26	|	4	|	3	|	2	|	1	|	8	|	7	|	6	|	5	|	12	|	11	|	10	|	9	|
+== proposal 7.1, regular season schedule 2.1.1 ==
+for those who prefer to not play interconference games
+Each team will play each other team in their division for 30 games.
+Each team will play the other teams from their conference 9 games, with extra home series traded from year to year to even the disadvantage.
+== proposal 8.0; Revise Playoff Structure to Traditional Methods ==
+Proposed by Jed Rosenthal (TRI)
+Revise playoff structure to traditional method instead of "choosing your opponent".
+The playoff structure will be as follows:
+Five teams from each conference will continue to make the playoffs - 3 division winners and 2 wild card teams from each conference.  Each of the 2 wildcard teams will play each other in a best of 5 game series.  The wild card winner will then play the team with the best record in his respective conference in a best of 7 series with the "best record" team having home field advantage.  The other 2 division winners will play each other in a best of 7 series and the team with the better regular season record will have home field advantage.  In the case each team has the same record, head-to-head play will be used as a tiebreaker.  The winners of each series will then square off in the conference championship in a best of 7 series - again home field advantage is determined by better regular season record and tiebreakers are determined by head-to-head records. The championship winners will meet in the IBL World Series in a best of 7 series.  The team with the better regular season record will have home field advantage (although if preferred it can be alternated between AC/NC each year).
+== proposal 9.0; All-Star Game winner gets home field in IBL CS ==
+Proposed by George Blas, POR
+In the spirit of Gerard's proposals to generate interest in the ASG (and the great idea of everyone's favorite Commish, Bud Selig), update sections 2.2.7 and 2.3 with the following:
+The winning conference of the All-Star Game will gain home field advantage in the IBL Championship Series. Games one, two, six and seven will be played at the site of the conference that won the All-Star Game, with the losing conference hosting games three, four and five.
+== proposal 10.0; Require home manager to send GRS to the manager hosting the visiting team for next week ==
+Proposed by George Blas, POR
+Along the same lines of current rules, where home manager sends GRS to next week's visiting manager. Update section 6.2 to say:
+Each member is required to send via E-mail, FAX, US Mail or phone a game report for their home series to the Commissioner, Vice-Commissioner, Registrar, visiting manager, next week's visiting manager, and the manager that will host the visiting team next week. Game reports are to arrive each week by 11:59 pm PDT Monday.
+e.g. In week 19, schedule has TRI@PHI. Week 20 has BUF@PHI and TRI@WMS. So PHI would be required to send Wk 19 TRI@PHI GRS to WMS in addition to TRI and BUF.
+== proposal 11.0; Yet another pitcher-batting rule ==
+Proposed by Christian Beliveau, SPO
+Manager declare at the beginning of the year if their park will be DH only or open to pitcher batting. Their decision will be available on the web site and could not be change for the year.
+Visiting manager decide if the game will be play with DH rule or pitcher batting when there is an opening for it and send his MIS accordingly to his choice.
+PA accumulate by pitchers can be redistributed to any batting player to a maximum of:
+option A: 1 PA per game that player play in the IBL
+option B: 2 PA per game that player play in the IBL