User Tools

Site Tools


2006_post-seaosn_ballot

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
2006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/12/23 05:56] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.12006_post-seaosn_ballot [2006/12/23 10:03] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.1
Line 277: Line 277:
  
 e.g. In week 19, schedule has TRI@PHI. Week 20 has BUF@PHI and TRI@WMS. So PHI would be required to send Wk 19 TRI@PHI GRS to WMS in addition to TRI and BUF. e.g. In week 19, schedule has TRI@PHI. Week 20 has BUF@PHI and TRI@WMS. So PHI would be required to send Wk 19 TRI@PHI GRS to WMS in addition to TRI and BUF.
 +
 +== proposal 11.0; Yet another pitcher-batting rule ==
 +
 +Proposed by Christian Beliveau, SPO
 +
 +Manager declare at the beginning of the year if their park will be DH only or open to pitcher batting. Their decision will be available on the web site and could not be change for the year.
 +
 +Visiting manager decide if the game will be play with DH rule or pitcher batting when there is an opening for it and send his MIS accordingly to his choice.
 +
 +PA accumulate by pitchers can be redistribuate to any batting player to a maximum of:
 +
 +option A: 1 PA per game that player play in the IBL
 +
 +option B: 2 PA per game that player play in the IBL
2006_post-seaosn_ballot.txt · Last modified: 2006/12/23 10:08 by 127.0.0.1