2006_mid-season_ballot
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2006_mid-season_ballot [2006/05/22 17:55] – (old revision restored) 127.0.0.1 | 2006_mid-season_ballot [2006/08/03 14:32] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ballot items for the 2006 mid-season ballot: | Ballot items for the 2006 mid-season ballot: | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Disallow repetitive submission of admendments == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add to section 1.2.1 | ||
+ | |||
+ | If a ballot amendment fails it may not be re-introduced for two calendar years. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Codify recent rulings on tiebreakers and playoffs == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Update section 2.2.x, renumber as necessary, add the following: | ||
+ | |||
+ | One Game Playoff | ||
+ | |||
+ | The IBL will use a one game playoff when a playoff spot is at stake | ||
+ | between the teams that are tied. Tiebreakers will be used when all | ||
+ | the teams that are tied are guaranteed a playoff spot. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If three or more teams are tied for both a division title and a wild | ||
+ | card spot, the division is first decided by one game playoff, followed | ||
+ | by additional one game playoffs for the wild card berth. | ||
+ | a division deciding playoff game does not break a tie for the wild | ||
+ | card berth. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tiebreakers | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tiebreakers are used to determine home field advantage or to sort | ||
+ | teams into division winner and wild card(s). | ||
+ | division winner is determined prior to resolving any other | ||
+ | tiebreakers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The tiebreaker order is: | ||
+ | - head-to-head record (round-robin record if 3+ teams) | ||
+ | - division record (conference record when teams are not in same division) | ||
+ | - road record | ||
+ | - coin flip | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Codify recent ruling on home field advantage when teams are tied == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2.2.4 Wild Card Series | ||
+ | |||
+ | The two wild card teams will face each other in the Wild Card Series | ||
+ | of the IBL playoffs. | ||
+ | team with the better winning percentage. | ||
+ | Commissioner will use tiebreakers to select the host team. The Wild Card | ||
+ | Series will be a 5-game series, with games 1, 2 and 5 played at the host | ||
+ | team, and games 3 and 4 played at the visiting team. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2.2.5 Division Series | ||
+ | |||
+ | The team with the best record in the conference will face its choice | ||
+ | of either the wild card winner or the division champion with the worst | ||
+ | winning percentage in the Division Series of the IBL playoffs. | ||
+ | two remaining teams will play in the other Division Series. | ||
+ | teams for the Division Series are the division champions with the top | ||
+ | two winning percentages. | ||
+ | use tiebreakers to select the host team. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Less penalty for using emergency catcher with experience at the position == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change wording in 3.6.1, from: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pitchers must also use their fatigue numbers while a non-catcher is catching. | ||
+ | |||
+ | to: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pitchers must use their fatigue numbers while a non-catcher is catching, unless the non-catcher has been rated at catcher in at least two other carded seasons. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Suspended games in the post-season == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add to section 2.2.9: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Post-season games which have reached the 5th inning will be suspended if prematurely ended due to adverse conditions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Clarify ruling about applying injury time to off-days == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change wording in section 2.1.7 from: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Off days following a series will count as one day missed in relation to injuries. | ||
+ | |||
+ | to: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Off days on both the home and road schedule count as one day missed in relation to injuries. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == mid-week activation == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add to section 3.2.1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Changes to the active roster may be designated as mid-week transactions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add to section 3.2.2: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mid-week transactions do not count toward the two week minimum for players placed on the inactive roster. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == allow use of PA limited player as injury replacement == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add new section 3.2.7: | ||
+ | |||
+ | When the only rated replacement for a player unavailable due to injury, ejection, or suspension is a player with an exhausted PA limitation, the limited player may be allowed by the opposing manager to enter the game without resulting in forfeit. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == require winning team in a playoff series to submit GRS, add IP penalty == | ||
+ | [ sweda ] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add to section 2.2.1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The manager of the team winning a playoff series is responsible for submitting a complete GRS (including boxscores, play-by-play, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add to section 5.2.4: | ||
+ | |||
+ | -3 per week for missing playoff GRS | ||
+ | |||
== Wrong Fielder covering [back from ballot in 03, not sure who wrote it up]== | == Wrong Fielder covering [back from ballot in 03, not sure who wrote it up]== |
2006_mid-season_ballot.1148334944.txt.gz · Last modified: 2006/06/04 17:57 (external edit)